|

| |
Driving With
BiOptic Telescopic Lens Systems
A presentation
by Charles P. Huss, C.O.M.S
This paper was presented at The Eye and The Auto
International Forum in June 2001 at the Daimler Chrysler Technology Center
in Auburn Hills MI. The Eye and The Auto is a research project of the
Detroit Institute of Ophthalmology (DIO). Thirty-two of the world's
leading authorities in vision and vision related research were brought to
the metropolitan area of Detroit as guests of the DIO to discuss the relationship
of vision and safe operation of motorized vehicles. For more information, go to
http://www.eyeson.org and click-on The
Eye and The Auto, under Research. The proceedings are available for
purchase.
Index to the
Presentation
0.
The
Presentation
1.
What is a BiOptic
telescopic lens system (BTLS)?
2.
What
benefits can a visually impaired driver derive from the use of a
BTLS?
3.
Using the BTLS
during the driving task
4.
Introducing
a visually impaired person to the proper use of the BTLS for driving.
5.
Major misconceptions about driving with a
BTLS.
6.
Who is a good candidate for driving
with a BTLS?
7.
The most common types, styles and power of BTLS used
in driving
8.
How to improve and better regulate driving with a
BTLS.
9.
Concluding
Remarks
10.
Questions or
Concerns and Responses
11. SLIDES
0.) The Presentation
Currently (6/2001) there are 31 States that issue driver licenses
to select low vision individuals who use BiOptic telescopic lens systems.
Collectively there are over 4,000 such drivers in the United States.
Despite the fact that such licensing practices have existed in many of
these States for 10 - 30 years, some individuals still question, and
perhaps rightfully so, the validity and use of such devices for
driving. The intent of my presentation is to educate and provide
insight as to what driving with BiOptic telescopic lens systems is all
about starting with:

1) What is a BiOptic telescopic
lens system?
A BiOptic telescopic lens system (abbreviated BTLS) is a
combination two(2) lens optical system consisting of a standard or
conventional pair of carrier lenses (slide 1); and a miniature telescopic
lens unit(s) mounted permanently at a 10 degree angle to the upper or
superior portion of the carrier lens (slide 2).
These devices (slide 3), which are mounted in a sturdy
frame presenting spring loaded hinges and adjustable nose pads, are
prescription in nature and available through an optometrist or
ophthalmologist who specializes in clinical low vision.

2) What benefits can a
visually impaired driver derive from the use of a BTLS?
Once trained in the proper and appropriate use of a BTLS,
a visually impaired driver is able to detect and identify detail (slide
4), color (slide 5) and/or movement of distantly positioned objects or
forms more effectively and confidently.
When using the latter device, the visually impaired driver
is able to increase his/her " margin of safety " from critical objects or
forms present within, along side of , or approaching their intended path
of travel (slide 6).
Margin of safety is defined as the time or distance needed
by the BTLS user to process, predict and decide whether or not to react to
such critical objects or conditions.
Driver education professionals define critical objects or
conditions as any object or condition which can be predicted to influence
or require drivers to adjust their vehicle's speed and/or lane position..
Examples include: roadway characteristics, other road users and traffic
control devices.

3) In what manner, under what conditions and how often
would a visually impaired driver use their BTLS during the driving
task?
Persons using a BTLS look through the lower carrier lens (slide
7) for general viewing purposes (for instance, for gross object
awareness or orientation to their driving environment); and through the
telescopic lens unit for more distant detail/color/activity recognition as
previously indicated during the driving task (slide 8).
Movement into and out of the telescopic or magnifying
portion of the device is accomplished through a simple synchronized
downward-upward head and eye movement.
The upper limit of one's pupil should be parallel or in
line with the lower portion of the ocular lens end of the telescopic unit
during carrier lens viewing.
This offers the best or optimal viewing through the
carrier lens and minimal fixation time , going from unmagnified to
magnified viewing and back.
Vertical spotting through one's BTLS is recommended only
on straight or relatively straight stretches of roadway; and then only in
the absence of critical objects or forms within the space cushion
surrounding the BTLS user's vehicle. The telescopic portion of this lens
system is used for extremely short periods of time (one second or less per
fixation ).
Because of its physical location on the carrier lens
(above one's normal line of sight or viewing) the telescopic portion of
the device will not obstruct the other 95-97 per cent of normal non-
magnified viewing accomplished through the larger carrier lens while
driving.
The frequency of use of the BTLS is dependent upon the
user's ever-changing driving environment , his/her familiarity to the
latter, the dynamics of driving environment (slide 9), and an individual's
functional vision abilities related to awareness acuity*
v. identification
acuity* v. preferred viewing distance* (with and without the
BTLS).
If the above-mentioned functional visual acuity terms are
new to your vocabulary, permit me to define what each means
briefly:
*Awareness acuity - refers to the furthest distance at
which the presence of any form is first detected (for ex. shapes against
the sky, blobs or blurs of color indistinguishable as specific
objects);
*Identification acuity - refers the furthest possible
distance at which a detected form is first correctly identified (for ex.
that red blob is beginning to look like a car);
*Preferred viewing distance - refers to the most
comfortable distance for identifying a detected form (for ex. " I am
definitely sure now that object is a car ")
Definitions taken from Foundations of Orientation and Mobility,
Weiner and Blasch, Eds.,1996 from chapter entitled Low Vision Mobility by
Duane K Geruschat and Audrey J. Smith.

4) How do you go about introducing a visually impaired
person to the proper and appropriate use of the BTLS for
driving?
An easy and effective way to familiarize a visually
impaired person to the proper and appropriate use of the BTLS for driving
is as follows:
- Locate a straight stretch of paved roadway at least 100
-150 yards in length with minimal to no moving traffic (preferably a
two-lane, 2-way roadway with double solid yellow pavement markings and
white edge lines);
- Have student position self approximately 2-3 feet to
the right of the yellow pavement markings (corresponding to the position
that he/she would assume when driving on this type of roadway,
slide
10);
- Have instructor position self in an identical position
as student is , then turn and face student at a typical conversational
distance (2-3 feet apart);
With head mounted 49MHz transceivers and BTLS in place
on student and instructor (slide 11), have instructor explain to student
that he/she will walk off a 10 yard distance from the student ,
positioning self mid- way between pavement markings and edge line on same
side of roadway as student is standing, and then turn and face the
student;
- At this first 10 yard distance from one another,
instructor will explain how to use the BTLS via a basic vertical spotting
technique, and then request that the student practice reinforcing the
latter 5 times slowly;
At this same distance, instructor will introduce
student to the optical and non-optical characteristics of the BTLS (which
is the center of controversy between opponents and proponents of these
devices for driving) via hands-on demonstration and feedback. The latter
will include but not be limited to:
-
Differences in image size v. distance (slide 12)
-
Fixation time
-
Restricted field of view (slide 13)
-
Ring/rectangular
scotoma (slides 14-15)
-
Apparent movement of objects in direction
opposite to head movement
-
Reference point maintenance (magnified v.
unmagnified field, (slide 16)
-
Linear distance relationships between
instructor and student under magnified v. non-magnified viewing conditions
(stating the actual v. apparent distances measured in yards and feet from
a prepared distance equivalent sheet);
-
This is where the aforementioned functional vision
abilities of awareness acuity, identification acuity and preferred viewing
distance come into play under magnified v. non-magnified viewing
conditions.
- All of the above exercises and hands-on experiences are
then repeated at increasingly 10 yards increments (out to 100
yards).
By lesson's end , many of our past students have stated
that for one of the first times in their lives, they finally have some
concrete idea of how they compare or match up to a normally sighted person
in terms of what objects, forms or activity they can detect and identify
under magnified v. unmagnified conditions, at different distances, natural
lighting and weather conditions.
Students also find themselves capable of using their
respective BTLS as an of effective vertical spotting device (needing only
.5 of a second per fixation) after only 1-2 hours training.
The latter then sets the stage for continued BTLS
reinforcement under dynamic on-road conditions; first as a
passenger-in-car, then while driving.

5) What are some of the major
misconceptions about driving with a BTLS?
Misconception #1:
A BTLS is the " cure all " to being a safe low vision
driver.
Misconception #2:
Low vision drivers need not use a BTLS in familiar
driving environments (slide 17).
Misconception #3:
BTLS are used continuously v. intermittently during
driving; and as a result, a BTLS user drives blind to traffic (slide
18).
Misconception #4:
Approach magnification, or moving closer to an object
to see it, is safer than using a BTLS because the field of vision and
depth perception are not affected and there is no need to change fixation
(slide 19).
Misconception #5: The only way we can determine the safety of BTLS
drivers is over prolonged periods of time and field experience.
Misconception #6: Legally-blind BTLS drivers have higher at-fault
accident and violation rates than BTLS drivers with milder forms of
central visual acuity loss.

6) What type of visually
impaired driver would likely make a good candidate for driving with a BTLS?
From my personal experiences of working directly with
individuals who participated in our WV Low Vision Driving Study,
1985-1995, and from other authors (including but not limited to: William
Feinbloom, OD, Dennis Kelleher, Ed.D., Ian Bailey, OD, and
Randy Jose,
OD), I would say the following characteristics best describe the type of
individual who would be an appropriate candidate for driving with a BTLS (slide
20):
- Pre-driver readiness and awareness skills (list of
skill areas available by contacting author)
- Stable ocular condition,
preferably congenital or long term in nature
- Visual acuity between
20/50 and 20/200 inclusive with best standard or conventional correction;
(slide 21)
- Full bilateral field of view and absent of any large
scotomas (if monocular, at least 120 degrees horizontally and 80 degrees
vertically, slide 22)
- Improved visual acuity via telescopic
magnification to meet a State's visual acuity screening standard for
driver licensing (slides 23-25)
- Non-photophobic
- Good glare
recovery skills
- Good contrast sensitivity skills
- Good color vision
- Normal head, neck and eye motility
- Normal bilateral hearing
- Average to above-average intelligence
- Free of visual
attention deficits
- Highly motivated, dedicated, hard working, goal
orientated
- Non-aggressive, yet assertive
- Non-impulsive
- Able
to accept objective criticism
- Emotionally stable
- Past
participation in sports or recreational activities that require eye-lead
and head and eye scanning abilities (for example: basketball, baseball,
racket-ball, bicycling, roller-blading, skateboarding, downhill
skiing).

7) What are some of the most
common types, styles and power of BTLS used in driving?
The BiOptic telescopic lens systems used in the WV Low
Vision Driving Study, were designed and manufactured by Designs for
Vision, Inc. (DVI), Ronkonkoma, NY and Edward's Optical Corporation
(BITA), Virginia Beach, VA. (slides 26-30)
The range of magnification allowed for use by participants
was 2.2X - 4.0X.. In most instances, the strength (expressed in X- powers
of magnification) of the BTLS prescribed for our graduates was obtained by
dividing the carrier lens acuity level by 20/40, the arbitrarily set
visual acuity protocol for our study. 20/40 was the visual acuity
screening standard in place in WV for an unrestricted driver's license at
the onset of our study.
Specifically:
· 7 individuals were fitted with the DVI 2.2X BIO II (4
OD, 3 OS)
· 2 individuals were fitted with the DVI 2.2 X BIO II Eagle Eye
(1OS, 1 OU)
· 6 individuals were fitted with the DVI 3.0 X BIO I (3 OD, 2
OS, 1OU)
· 5 individuals were fitted with the 3.0 X BITA (3 OD, 2 OS)
· 10
individuals were fitted with the 4.0 X DVI BIO I (8 OD, 1OS, 1OU)
· 2
individuals were fitted with the DVI 4.0X EFP (1OD, 1OS)
Other prescription BTLS that have been fitted and
dispensed to visually impaired drivers of other States include:
· Ocutech Inc.'s 3X-4X Visual Enhancing System (VES-K) and
3X VES- MINI (slides 31-33);
· Optical Designs, Inc. 4X Behind-The-Lens
Telescope (slide 34);
· M-Tech Optics Corporation 4X M-Lens SYSTEM
(slide 35).
Of the 32 individuals who completed our program of
instruction satisfactorily, 28 graduates were fitted and dispensed BTLS
presenting monocular mounted telescopic lens units; while the 4 other
remaining graduates were fitted and dispensed BTLS presenting binocular
mounted telescopic lens units.

8) What can be done to improve and
better regulate driving with a BTLS?
- Mandate formalized low vision driver education training
and assessment (slides 36 to 39 ,
40
to 45 and 46 to
49/50);
- Provide staff in-service training related to driving
with low vision and BTLS to driver examiners who will be assigned to test
BTLS candidates;
- Require standardized passenger-in-car testing and
actual on-road testing by trained driver license examiners for all
applicants seeking driver licensure using BTLS;
- Test and allow competency-based driving
privileges;
- Require periodic eye and driving
re-examinations;
- Encourage States to keep and maintain driving records
of BTLS drivers;
- Use a certified driver rehabilitation specialist
(C.D.R.S.) and/or certified orientation and mobility specialist
(C.O.M.S.), who has experience in evaluating and training BTLS drivers, as
a liaison to State Department of Motor Vehicles Medical/Vision Advisory
Boards.

9) Concluding Remarks
In conclusion, learning how to use a BTLS properly and
appropriately is just one aspect of formalized low vision driver education
training and assessment. (please see
LOW VISION DRIVER EDUCATION TRAINING, a published article by Charles P. Huss).
As student learns and gains experience with all the
physical, mental and social skills required of the driving task,
instruction moves from a spoon-fed approach to that requiring independent
decision making.
The latter then permits the introduction of a standardized
objective type of on-road driving assessment, including the correct use of
one's BTLS under real-world driving conditions.
Such standardized on-road assessments can and have been
used to monitor a student's progress and advise instructors and student
what areas of instruction need to be emphasized during the remaining weeks
of training, prior to consideration of application for driver licensure.
Once again, thank you for this opportunity !!! With time
remaining, I will address any questions or concerns that faculty or
attendees may have concerning " Driving with BiOptic telescopic lens
systems".

10) Questions or Concerns and
Responses
Question: I realize that it may differ from
individual to individual, but can you give us a basic idea of how much
training an individual should have in order to drive with BiOptics?
Answer: In West Virginia, we offered an
individualized, competency based, concurrent type of low vision driver
training program extending over 6-8 weeks. Normally a student would
receive: 30 hours of classroom instruction, 40 hours of passenger-in-car
experiences (a combination of environmental awareness and hazard
perception skill training, with their prescription BiOptic telescopic lens
system in place), and up to 50 hours of behind -the-wheel training if
needed.
Concern: (Phillip Hessburg, M.D.) I wanted this
paper delivered because I'm not sure I believe this or don't believe this.
I think what it proves is that most people do most of their driving at
about 20/200 or are able to. I'm not sure that what we're doing with this
use of the BiOptic) isn't primarily reading street signs and determining
whether a traffic signal is red or green.
I am also not certain whether or not, as ophthalmologists,
we should be recommending that we refer visually impaired persons to
Doctor Mogk, M.D., Ophthalmologist for evaluation, fitting and
prescription of BiOptic telescopic lens systems? Until I know that I am
not doing a disservice to such low vision patients, I'm am not going to
recommend it. So maybe over the course of the next two days, you're going
to convince me that I am not doing a disservice to people. My purpose is
to increase the mobility and the independence of elderly people, but I'm
not positive yet, nor have you convinced me, that the way to do it is with
BiOptic telescopic lens systems. [For more information about fitting
a BiOptic, please
click here].
Dr. Lylas Mogk, do you want to comment? Are you
prescribing them, or should we be?
Response and Question ( by Lylas Mogk, M.D.): No. I
have a question, rather than a statement. You mentioned that vision should
be stable. What does that mean? Are we talking six months, one year, two
years?
Answer: Preferably, congenital in nature, present
since birth. Because as the person grows and matures, he or she becomes
accustomed to their low vision condition and their perception of the world
through those functional parameters. The person's success in many
instances is conditional or resultant to past parental upbringing, where
for instance parents may or may not of permitted their son or daughter to
participate in sports, bicycling, or pedestrian travel independently away
from their home surroundings.
What we found in the WV Low Vision Driving Study,
1985-1995, is that though 107 individuals were identified as meeting the
arbitrarily set visual protocol for inclusion in our study, not all wanted
to participate. In fact, as a result of further screening procedures and
participation in intensive driver education training ( 2 hours of
classroom, 2 hours of passenger-in-car, 2 hours of behind-the wheel
training, and normally at least an additional 2 hours of self-study per
day, for 6-8 weeks) only about 30 per cent of our population sample were
able satisfy the requirements for completion of our program and considered
driver ready for application for WV driver licensure.
Statement by Dr. Mogk: That's what I thought you
meant. There is a lot of confusion about that term in the senior
population and the people who care for them, because often people are
described as having stable macular degeneration.
Response: One of the things I think we should all
remember is that persons who develop age-related dry macular degeneration oftentimes had normal visual acuity and fields of vision in
their growing years, along with a 20/20 brain. As they age and develop
macular degeneration (along with the reduction in visual acuity
functioning, say 20/200 in their better functioning eye), they are still
trying to interpret the world around them with a 20/20 brain. And that is
where as a driver evaluator or driver educator you will notice or observe
such individuals illustrating orientation related difficulties, because of
their desire to still remain orientated to their surroundings with their
former 20/20 brain.
Concern (from Dr. Mogk):
That I certainly
understand. The further concern is, as soon as they are fitted and
trained, their scotoma changes.
Response: Remember, the BiOptic training exercise
that I shared with you is only a small fraction of the extensive
passenger-in-car training which respective candidates participate in as
part of their formalized program of low vision driver education training
and assessment. The enclose newsletter article will give a better
awareness of the various stages of screening, training and assessment
included in our respective program of instruction. In fact, the WV Code
allows us to screen, train and assess potential drivers without a valid WV
instructional permit, as long as such instruction is provided by a driver
educator licensed by the State and conducted in a dual brake controlled
vehicle. The latter allows us to adequately determine which candidates are
v. are not driver ready for continuance with driver education training and
subsequently application for driver licensure. And sometimes it takes 3-4
weeks to determine the latter.
Concern (Dr. Barry Skarf, M.D.): I'm a
neuro-ophthalmologist. I wanted to point out also regarding the question
of Dr. Mogk. The younger the person - it does not have to be in my
experience - a congenital defect; though people with congenital defects
amaze me at the ability they have just learned because their brain has
worked with what they have been born with.
But even young people, as teenagers, or I have a young
fellow who was 10 years old when he lost part of his vision - or even in
their thirties or forties - they're motivated, and they are willing to
make an effort, and they got a stable condition. For instance, a young
person who lost bilateral vision due to optic atrophy, let's say
hereditary optic atrophy, it's a condition where you you lose central
vision, but once you lose it, it's stable, and those people are often
20/200. Those people, if they're motivated, can learn to function better,
but I think that the older a person gets, motivation isn't related to age
, and learning isn't related to age, but there is a co-relation. It
becomes a problem. Unfortunately, that age population is the one that has
the big numbers.
Response: I agree with you Dr. Skarf. I would also
like to point out that it has been our experience in West Virginia, that
environmental awareness training or re-training with prospective low vision
drivers, regardless of age or onset of their respective visual impairment,
is facilitated if we break down the various groups of critical objects or
conditions into subgroups and have students learn or re-learn to detect
and identify such objects or conditions one subgroup at a time. For example, with the student
positioned as a passenger in the front right seat of the driver education
vehicle, have them practice detecting and identifying verbally the larger
and more noticeable roadway characteristics such as a dip in the road,
curve in the road, hill ahead, fixed hazards in or along side of the
roadway which restrict or interfere with other road users' line of sight
to them and their line of sight to other road users.
Then practice detecting other road users, whether they be
on two feet or four feet, two wheels or several wheels.
Then, integrating the proper and appropriate use of their
prescription BiOptic lens system; having the student practice detecting
detail or signage off of distantly positioned road signs, color off of
traffic lights, or other forms of activity or other gross movement in
their magnified field(s) of view which may need to be responded to in
terms of speed and or lane position adjustment of their vehicle when
driving.
In other words starting with the big picture of their
driving environment, and then locating more specific detail within that
ever changing dynamic setting.
Concern (by Dr. Hessburg): I think that one of the
things that distinguishes the West Virginia program from others that we've
seen is that your program is more intensive. I know that in some States,
and I have anecdotal evidence in our own State, that people use their
dispensed BiOptic lens system to take the test and never drive with them
on. They use the BiOptic lens system to pass the test (20/40 letters or
numbers of an acuity chart) because of the magnification of the latter
device But the latter device is not being used during driving. Whether
they are not being trained properly, or whether our State does not require
them to be trained, I do not know. But when I see them in my office, and I
ask them, " how much of the time do you drive using the device?" They say
" well, I always have it in the car with me ".
Response: It has been our experience that if lack
of use of the device does occur, it is more likely to take place with
individuals presenting more mild levels of visual acuity loss (say in the
range of 20/50-20/70); and less likely to be abused or non used by
individuals with more moderate levels of visual acuity loss (say in the
20/80 - 20/120 range or 20/140 -20/200 range).
Like any device, if someone is taught how to properly
utilize the device, especially as it presents itself here under dynamic
conditions (and the benefits of its usage is made known or experienced by
the user, under real world driving conditions, the likelihood of use is
enhanced several-fold.
On a separate note and related to your statement Dr.
Hessburg, the visual screening in West Virginia, is usually waived and
replaced by results of a complete eye examination , provided by a licensed
ophthalmologist or optometrist of a student's choice, on a form called a
Driver License Advisory Board Vision Report Form (DLAB-2 Form), which is
then sent to our DMV headquarters in Charleston, WV, reviewed by our
State's DMV Medical Advisory Board; and then recommendation is made to the
DMV Commissioner as to whether or not to issue or deny an instructional
permit for driving.
Concern (by Kathleen Miller, OTR/L): I am an
Occupational Therapist, employed by Edwin Shaw Hospital, Akron, OH. I do
training with low vision clients. I initially started as an occupational
therapist doing driver evaluations for people with disabilities, such as
strokes, head injuries, amputations, various problems. I was approached by
an optometrist in Ohio to do the training aspect of it in the Akron area.
The Columbus area also has a program, and they have been established for
approximately nine to ten years.
So they have a pretty established program, but typically,
the clients need to go to an established clinician that deals with these
programs, and they need to be prescribed telescopes through these
experienced professionals.
Then they need to have a mobility specialist who takes
them out to make sure that they know how to use them as
intended.
Then in turn they come to professionals like myself and we
do the on-road training, including the correct integration and utilization
of their prescription BiOptic lens system during the driving task.. If
they are able to complete all of the above types of training and
requirements, then and only then are they permitted to apply for driver
licensure in the State of Ohio. The State of Ohio has specifically trained
officers or driver license examiners that test prospective low vision
applicants for driver licensure. Perhaps the lack of formalized programs
of low vision driver education training and assessment in other respective
States, that also license BiOptic driver applicants, is one main reason
why some such drivers under-utilize or never realize the true benefits
derived from their use under dynamic real world driving
conditions.
Response: Thank you for bringing the latter to the
attention of attendees of this colloquium. I am very familiar with the
formalized programs of low vision driver education training and testing in
States such as Ohio, Indiana, Virginia, Maryland and most recently
Kentucky where fellow staff and I from the WV Rehabilitation Center have
been directly involved in staff training issues (including DMV or DPS
driver examiners and supervisory personnel), legislative efforts, and
program development in years past.
If you have another
concern or question regarding the use of a BiOptic during the driving
task, please post
it here.

Below is the collection of slides from Chuck Huss'
presentation
|
1
 |
2
 |
3  |
|
1 - Frontal view of Designs for Vision, Inc.
(DVI) 2.2X Galilean BIO II binocular mock-up BiOptic telescopic lens
system in standard black Yeoman frame (note the physical location of
telescopic units - above the normal viewing area through the
carrier or support lenses) |
2 - Lateral view of student viewing through
the carrier lens of his DVI 2.2X Galilean Eagle Eye BIO II BiOptic
telescopic lens system (note the ten degree drilling angle through
the carrier lens for proper mounting of the telescopic unit for
efficient vertical spotting purposes) |
3 - Posterior view of DVI 2.2X Galilean
Eagle Eye BIO II BiOptic telescopic lens system (complete with
spring-loaded hinges and adjustable nose pads for snug fit and
clinical adjustment if needed) |
|
4
 |
5
 |
6
 |
|
4 - Rural driving scene in WV illustrating a
straight stretch of roadway where proper use of a BiOptic telescopic
lens system as a vertical spotting device would enable a driver to
detect and react to the printed information or symbol messages
presented on typical road signs |
5 - Medium business driving scene in WV
where use of the BiOptic telescopic lens system as a vertical
spotting device would enable the user to spot the necessary detail
or color off of ancillary pavement markings (turn arrows) and
traffic lights respectfully far enough in advance for a driver to
adjust speed and/or lane position to meet the demands of the
intended driving task
|
6 - Small business driving scene in WV where ample eye lead
time (intended location of your vehicle down the roadway in the next
so many seconds of driving) and BiOptic usage if necessary, would increase a driver's margin of
safety; enabling the driver to begin deciding and undertaking the
necessary adjustments in speed and/or lane position to avert
encounters with other critical objects or forms within or along side
his/her path of travel v. reliance on detail gathered off of
approaching road signs
|
|
7
 |
8
 |
9
 |
|
7 - Lateral view of student viewing through the carrier lens
of his DVI 2.2X Eagle Eye BIO II BiOptic telescopic lens system
(note, student's view through carrier lens is directly below and
within close proximity to the telescopic housing; an advantage of
using frames with adjustable nose pads - to optimize viewing area
and minimize fixation time from carrier lens to telescopic lens and
back) |
8 - Lateral view of student viewing through the telescopic
lens of his DVI 2.2X Galilean Eagle Eye BIO II BiOptic telescopic
lens system (time spent viewing through telescope is .5 of a second
or less per fixation) |
9 - Metropolitan driving scene in WV emphasizing the need for
drivers to: stay out of each others' blind spots, not tailgate and
keep their eyes moving (DO NOT STARE) to obtain the big picture and
react to the demands of the dynamic driving scene |
|
10
 |
11  |
12  |
|
10 - Student with head mounted transceiver and
BiOptic
telescopic lens system in place, looking down two-lane roadway,
responding to instructor's questions relative to instructor's
movements and facial positions (results in students'
self-realization of what they can detect and decipher at varying
distances and lighting conditions while instructor is stationery or
moving) |
11 - Student and instructor discussing the
actual v. apparent linear distance relationships from prepared
distance measurement sheets when changing view from carrier to
telescopic lens (for ex. when positioned at 20 yards, the student will notice an
apparent reduction of half the true linear distance when changing
fixation from carrier lens to telescopic lens viewing while using a
2.0X BiOptic telescopic lens system) |
12 - Posterior view of student looking down
roadway and mimicking the movements of the instructor from varying ten yard
incremental distances through carrier v. telescopic lens (
Note, telescopic viewing not only enhances user's distant detail and
color perception but also movement of objects or
forms) |
|
13  |
14  |
15  |
|
13 - Frontal view of person viewing through
the telescopic unit of a 3.0X DVI binocular Galilean BIO I BiOptic
telescopic lens system (trained BiOptic users learn to adjust
readily to the brief angular scotoma or absence of visible viewing
area created by binocular mounted telescopic lens systems or
monocular systems if the person functions monocularly, without
affecting their awareness of their peripheral
surroundings)
|
14 - Four (4) DVI Galilean BiOptic
telescopic lens systems of the same dioptric strength, yet different
in size, style, field of view, use , weight, etc. (Oftentimes, the
larger in size units are perceived inadvertently as being stronger in
terms of magnification ) |
15 - Lateral view of person looking through
Edward's Optical Bi-level Telemicroscopic Apparatus (BITA) Vision
Enhancer (Note this unit's small size, apparent lighter weight,
improved cosmesis and potential for increased awareness of one's
para-central and peripheral fields of view while viewing through the
telescopic portion of the device) |
|
16  |
17
 |
18  |
|
16 - Posterior lateral view of student
participating in an indoor vertical spotting training exercise while
using his BiOptic lens system ( note, because of vertex distance in BiOptic telescopic lens systems - the linear distance between the
cornea of one's
eye(s) and a carrier lens or ocular lens of a telescopic lens unit,
a person is able to follow or track movement in their periphery
quite effectively as illustrated)
|
17 - Frontal view of approaching
roadway construction site, illustrating where drivers, even when traveling
in familiar areas or on familiar roadways, have no control over what
happens outside of their vehicle relative to other road users,
roadway conditions, weather, etc. Thus ample eye-lead time and
proper BiOptic usage could increase the margin of safety for the low
vision driver considerably |
18 - Lateral view of student viewing through
the telescopic lens of his DVI 2.2X Galilean Eagle Eye BIO II BiOptic telescopic lens system (Note, one DOES NOT continually view
through the telescopic portion of their BiOptic lens system, but
rather intermittently for .5 second intervals on primarily vertical
spotting related tasks as needed) |
|
19  |
20  |
21
 |
|
19 - Medium business driving scene in WV
presenting traffic lights suspended from the far side of a
multi-lane cross road and multi-directional route signs on near
right corner of intersection (serves as an excellent reason why
lower acuity drivers should use BiOptic telescopic lens systems v.
approach magnification methods ( the latter entailing driving slower
and getting closer to an object or form of concern before detecting
and deciding what action to pursue) to increase one's margin of
safety. If the appropriate sign or traffic light is detected soon
enough, the driver is able to move into the appropriate lane while
legal to do so or prevent driving beyond painted stop lines,
crosswalks or into the intersection itself.
|
20 - Student with BITA lens system posing proudly
with newly acquired driver's license ( ***** the most common
concern or limitation expressed by physically challenged
individuals, especially visually challenged individuals in
attempting to find or keep a job or live independently in a rural
State, is TRANSPORTATION) |
21 - Clinician performing part of his low
vision examination (obtaining distance visual acuity readings of
patient one eye at a time) |
|
22
 |
23
 |
24
 |
|
22 - Student participating in automated
perimetry testing conducted by clinician's assistant (objectively
assessing one's central and peripheral fields of view using a
Humphrey's Field Analyzer) |
23 - Clinician evaluating and
fitting a
monocular mounted DVI Galilean BIO I 4.0 X BiOptic telescopic lens
system to patient as part of the low vision examination (using a DVI
manufactured slotted trial frame, accessory trial rings and spacers
as needed ) in preparation for participation in formalized low
vision driver education training and assessment.
|
24 - Posterior view of DVI Yeoman Frame
typically used for evaluating and
fitting BiOptic telescopic lens
systems (including slotted carrier lenses, trial lens retainer
rings, adjustable nose pads and spring loaded hinges) |
|
25
 |
26
 |
27
 |
|
25 - DVI mock-up trial frame ( including
slotted carrier lenses, locking rings, spacers, Galilean v. Expanded
Field Prism telescope |
26 - Birdseye/overhead view of DVI 2.2X
Galilean BIO II BiOptic telescopic lens system in black Yeoman frame
with velcro strap (the latter decreases the probability of system
breakage or becoming a projectile in the event of an impact
collision with other road users or roadway
characteristics.
|
27 - Birdseye/overhead view of DVI 3.0X
Galilean BIO I BiOptic telescopic lens system with drilled to fit
slip-in sunshade in place |
|
28
 |
29
 |
30
 |
|
28 - Lateral view of person viewing through
the telescopic unit of a DVI 4.0X Expanded Field Prism BiOptic
telescopic lens system (though weight, size, and cost is greater,
the clarity and field of view through this type of telescopic unit
is better or larger than most DVI Galilean BiOptic telescopic lens systems
|
29 - Frontal view of one of Edward's Optical
BITA binocular mock-up lens systems (note how the tinted superior
portion of the carrier lenses camouflages the presence and location
of the built-in miniature binocular BiOptic lens system … which has
gained particular acceptance by younger age telescopic lens
users)
|
30 - Frontal view of young female with a
BITA lens system in place inconspicuously in typical classroom
setting |
|
31
 |
32
 |
33  |
|
31 - Posterior lateral view of an Ocutech,
Inc. Vision Enhancing System (VES), focusable from distance to
twelve inches if needed |
32 - Frontal view of female with an
Ocutech,
Inc. Vision Enhancing System (VES) in place |
33 - Frontal comparison view of a DVI 3.0X
Expanded Field Prism BiOptic telescopic lens system (to the left) v.
an Ocutech, Inc. 3.0X Vision Enhancing System (VES) - MINI BiOptic
telescopic lens system (to the right) |
|
34
 |
35  |
36
 |
|
34 - Frontal view of female wearing an
Optical Designs, Inc. Behind- The - Lens Telescope (Note, the
designer of this system indicates that the inferior or inferior
temporal placement of this telescopic device requires users to make
a 36 degree lateral rotation of the eye, to look through the
telescope to see what is directly in front of them; no head movement
is required as is the case with most other BiOptic telescopic lens
systems)
|
35 - Posterior lateral view of a M-Tech
Optics Corporation's 4.0X M-Lens System (Note the unique needle-
like slide lever
which allows the user to efficiently change focus from distance to
near ranges without physically touching the housing of the miniature
telescope) |
36 - Box containing Doron Corporation's
complete set of filmstrip-cassettes covering all phases of hazard
perception and independent decision making (the latter audio-visual
materials is also available for purchase in laser disc or 16 mm film
format) |
|
37
 |
38
 |
39
 |
|
37 - Example of eye-lead time (the location
of your vehicle in the next so many seconds of driving time. As
vehicle speed increases, so must your eye lead time in order to
drive safely and maintain an adequate margin of safety from other
critical objects or conditions in your driving space ( Source:
American Automobile Association filmstrip-cassette
library) |
38 - Driving scene of basic skill small
business route in WV illustrating the need to scan early and
repeatedly as you approach an intersection (note the location of the
car in the intersection and the color of the traffic light facing perpendicular
away from the intersection) |
39 - Driving scene of basic skill interstate
route in WV illustrating the recommended 3 - 4 second in length
following distance from vehicles ahead of your vehicle, and behind
when possible (Note,
greater following distances are recommended when following trucks or
other larger in-size vehicles, Source: Doron
Corporation)
|
|
40
 |
41
 |
42  |
|
40 - Frontal view of student indicating to
instructor by extending his right hand and arm out the driver's
side window when instructor's presence enters the left rear side
blind spot area of the inside rearview mirror of the stationary
driver education vehicle
|
41 - Driving scene of mid skill medium
business route in WV illustrating the need for ample lateral eye
scanning and eye lead time to detect the offset stop signs suspended
by wires above and amidst the bush at the near right corner of this
wide intersection |
42 - Driving scene of basic skill
residential route in WV illustrating that as one approaches an
unlighted yet controlled plus-shaped intersection, the recommended
sequence of visual scanning by a driver to determine who must stop
and yield is to first view the near right corner, then the far left
corner, then the near left corner, and lastly the far right corner
respectfully before one proceeds into the intersection |
|
43
 |
44
 |
45  |
|
43 - Driving scene of advanced skill
metropolitan route in WV illustrating inadequate following distance
from the larger in size vehicle ahead (Note, following too close to
other road users, as in this case, takes away one's safe escape to
the right or left in potential crash avoidance situations …. where
the presence of other road users or traffic control devices ahead
goes undetected) |
44 - Driving scene of advanced skill
metropolitan route in WV illustrating adequate following distance to
the large in size vehicle ahead (Note, the ability to detect the
presence of other road users and traffic control devices ahead and
to either side of the vehicle ahead; and if following distance is
even greater, the ability of the truck driver to detect your
presence through his side view mirrors respectively) |
45 - Campus driving scene in WV illustrating
how all students who participated in the training phase of the WV
Low Vision Driving Study, 1985-1995 were required to have their
prescription BiOptic telescopic lens system in place starting day 1
of the behind-the wheel phase of training, though integration of the
actual use of the device into the driving task in most cases was not
illustrated until the beginning of the second week of training
(rationale behind this was to acquaint project participants with the
need to learn to view below the telescopic portion of the device for the greater
majority of the driving time and driving experiences; and to only
use the telescopic portion of the device for vertical spotting
purposes when distant detail , color or movement awareness was
necessary)
|
|
46
 |
47
 |
48
 |
|
46 - Driving scene of basic skill small
business route in WV illustrating the need for drivers to be able to
use closure principles to blend incomplete visual scenes within
their ever-changing driving environment in order to make appropriate
driving decisions to avoid contact with other road users who share
the same roadways (in this case filling in the portions of the
approaching stop sign partially hidden by the tree to recognize that
the driver must come to a stop before proceeding straight , left or
right at the approaching intersection) |
47 - Driving scene of advanced skill rural
route in WV illustrating the need for all drivers, especially low
vision drivers to be able to adjust to expected and unexpected
lighting changes when driving task involves driving in various
compass directions, times of the day, weather conditions,
environmental conditions , different seasons of the year,
etc. |
48 - Driving scene of mid skill small
business route in WV illustrating the need for all drivers,
especially low vision drivers to be able to detect changes in
traffic flow patterns well in advance to avoid contact with other
road users ( Note, clues provided by overhead and distantly
positioned regulatory signs, longitudinal and transverse pavement
markings, and the position and direction of travel of other road
users assist the driver in this situation as to what is v. is not
permissible by law |
|
49  |
50
 |
|
|
49 - Driving scene of advanced skill rural
route in WV illustrating the need for drivers, especially neophyte
low vision drivers to interpret correctly the message conveyed by
the warning sign (left turn ahead) not immediately but further down
the roadway as will become evident |
50 - Driving scene of advanced skill rural
route in WV illustrating the need for all drivers, especially low
vision drivers to be able to adjust quickly to expected and
sudden/abrupt changes in natural or environmental lighting (Note, in
order to negotiate this curved 30 - 35 yard in length stretch of
roadway through this old railroad tunnel, one needs to come to a
stop, turn on their head lights, roll down their window, listen for
any approaching traffic sounds coming from the one-lane roadway
through the tunnel; and if all is quiet, to proceed cautiously at a
low rate of speed through the tunnel which has a lateral clearance
of approximately 2-3 feet to either side of your vehicle)
|
|
To Find out more...
Where to get information on Driver Training:
The Association of Driver Educators for the Disabled (ADED)
provides information on driver rehabilitation programs that include low
vision driver training with spectacle mounted telescopes. For more
information contact ADED in the USA by telephone: 608 884-8833.
Email
, or access their website:
http://www.driver-ed.org
Also contact the
Academy for Certification of Vision Rehabilitation
and Education Professionals, (ACVREP) Call
520 887-6816 or visit their website
www.acvrep.org

Those interested in more information can
also write or
call:
Charles P. Huss, C.O.M.S. Coordinator, Low Vision Driver
Services
West Virginia Rehabilitation Center P.O. Box 1004 Barron Drive
Institute, WV 25112 TEL: 304-766-4803 FAX: 304-766-4816 Charles P. Huss is an Academy Certified Orientation and Mobility
Specialist with 25 years of teaching experience with visually impaired
individuals (K-Geriatrics).
|